

- Yeoman install webstorm generator#
- Yeoman install webstorm software#
- Yeoman install webstorm code#
- Yeoman install webstorm free#
Bootstrap is the UI-framework created by the Twitter team. Third option is whether to use Boostrap or not. SSAS is compiled into CSS and has a better syntax.

Next option was whether to use SSAS or not. The choices that would normally be presented on the command line when running Yeoman directly from a DOS-prompt, are nicely transferred to dialogs in WebStorm. So I selected Gulp.Īt this point it should also be noted that WebStorm has integrated Yeoman nicely (or perhaps the integration is made at a deeper level in NodeJS, I’m not sure). And the philosophy of Gulp (unix-like pipe operators combined to define the build process) seemed promising. I have struggled a bit with Grunt a year ago and didn’t immediately get the drift. However, to decide between the two I had to google a bit. I heard about the battle between grunt and gulp, two build systems for modern web applications. First it asked me if I wanted to use gulp instead of grunt. Then I clicked Next and Yeoman started running.
Yeoman install webstorm generator#
Going back to WebStorm I clicked the ‘angular’ generator and clicked ‘Install generator’. The most popular angular-based generator according to this page, is the generator simply called ‘angular’ maintained by the Yeoman team. However, to really analyze the list of possible generators and pick the most qualified we need to use the official Yeoman page of generators: I clicked Install generator, and I was presented by a search window showing all Yeoman generators. Or perhaps it detected that I had already installed the Yeoman NodeJS package on my own.Īnyway, in the ‘Select Project Type’ dialog I can see the generators already installed. Apparently WebStorm was configured to support Yeoman out of the box. Now I wanted to try the built-in support of Yeoman in WebStorm, so I went “File->New Project” and selected “Yeoman” from the popup dialog. WebStorm suggested to open this newly created folder, and I said Yes. I opened WebStorm 11 and from menu “VCS->Checkout from Source Control -> Git” I selected my newly created repository. On GitHub I added a new public repository called TodoAngular1: Otherwise, here follows the long and tedious description of what I did to realize the reference architecture.
Yeoman install webstorm free#
If you want to jump directly to my conclusions feel free to scroll down to the end of this article. The architecture should support continuous delivery and integration for large teams.The file structure should scale well for large teams.Even then – as we shall see soon – there are many options and issues coming up as we proceed. I have some background to support each of these architectural choices. Yeoman should be used as the scaffolding tool to setup the initial web app structure.NodeJS should be used as the build platform for the web app.
Yeoman install webstorm code#

The web app should be hosted on Windows Azure as a so-called Web App (previously known as a Web Site).The constraints I have put on the architecture is the following: Of course, if I had more time I could improve on the solution accordingly. I have spent three evenings, approximately 12 hours. I have described the process I actually followed with all the twists and turns involved in getting to a working solution. To demonstrate my point I simply document the process I followed in order to setup a reference architecture for an AngularJS single-page-app (web app).
Yeoman install webstorm software#
But the truth is that setting up a software architecture for a new combinationn of technologies – even if each individual piece of technology is well known – is a rather complex and unpredictable process. It might seem like a bad excuse when your software people tell you they need to spend yet another week on architecture. it might be difficult to understand why your software people are constantly strugling with all the things around the actual functionality, the actual business value. If you are a project manager, a infrastructure architect, a non-technical team manager, CEO, CTO etc. In this article I want to demonstrate why setting up a new software architecture is so hard.
